On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:13:38PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > First to note, that the libio stuff seems more stable to me. I don't > think I've ever completed a glibc build without a crash before.
I've done it a few times using stdio glibc too a few weeks ago. It's just that the whole system is getting more stable. > So I figured I would run `make check', which died partway through. Is > it too early to be interested in this? IMHO we should always fix bugs. > Note that this glibc is from a couple days ago, with the 'const' > removed. I will update soon with a CVS Head and using a gcc-3.1 > snapshot from March 14th. Don't forget to apply my patch (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2002-03/msg00005.html) if you're going to compile glibc CVS Head. IIRC when I tried "make check" it failed on both libio and stdio, the Head branch and 2.2 branch, but not always at the same tests. I haven't debugged the problems, I just continued with my pthreads stuff. Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
msg03640/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
