> But anyway, for a performance comparison between Hurd and Linux to be > meaningful, one would have to do it on the same or at least pretty > similar hardware. I just wanted to point out that I wouldn't expect > all kinds of heavy disk mangling to necessarily imply heavy cpu > activity.
Well, that's a very subjective observation but on the same machine under Linux, doing the same kind of operation (unpacking stuff), X looks much more 'reactive' than what I actually noticed under the Hurd. Cheers, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
