> does this affect us, in particular with my changes to set_state? I am not > even sure which tcsetattr implementation in glibc we use (the bsd one?).
tcsetattr means TIOCSETA*, directly. To follow POSIX as quoted, set_state ought not fail if set_bits fails. The change to the bottomhalf interface is still appropriate as it is. If set_bits fails, then set_state should not change c_cflags and the speeds in termstate. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
