Hi, I saw that the defs file have nice specific types like ipc_space_t and mach_port_name_t, but the C header files almost all have mach_port_t for them. In the Hurd, we have a typedef for each of these types and keep them in the header. We even use task_t in proc etc.
I am now using mach_port_t in mach.texi everywhere (where it is used in the generated C header file), rather than the more explicit type in the defs file. But maybe we don't want that? Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
