On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Diego Roversi wrote: > I see that storeio have a option "-e" that hide the device. I suppose that > using this option cause ext2fs to go through the storeio translator. So in > this case I can happily implement caching in storeio (even if we use more CPU).
[...] > Any suggestion? If you put it into libstore (not storeio), ext2fs without -e option to storeio *and* storeio can benefit from it (if I understand it correctly). So why not do that? Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
