> On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 04:49:17PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: > > That's fine by me if it's tested. BTW add -p to your diff switches. > > Actually, I goofed up. The arguments to the reply stub have not been > changed by my patch. In fact, as we now copy the user data all the time, a > seperate reply stub is not necessary anymore! There is also a bug > somewhere. > > I will work out something better. I didn't look closely, but now I am thinking twice. If the data is small enough to fit inline, and you use a separate reply stub, then you can send it without copying. That ought to be the common case. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server function... Marcus Brinkmann
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Marcus Brinkmann
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Marcus Brinkmann
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Marcus Brinkmann
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Marcus Brinkmann
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Roland McGrath
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Marcus Brinkmann
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Marcus Brinkmann
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Roland McGrath
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Marcus Brinkmann
- Bug#102437: dealloc analysis for each server fun... Marcus Brinkmann