Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > proc_getexecdata and proc_setexecdata both seem to be totally broken. > It seems like they have never actually been called. Surely true. > I think the only correct thing for proc_getexecdata to do is add a user ref > to each port and then set *portspoly to MACH_MSG_TYPE_MOVE_SEND. Seems right to me. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
- sending ports in reply msg Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: sending ports in reply msg Roland McGrath
- Re: sending ports in reply msg Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: sending ports in reply msg Marcus Brinkmann