Re: page fault in mach_msg_trap

[Jeff Bailey]

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:28:32PM +0000, Adam Olsen wrote:

> My thinking was that a hltonpanic=1 kernel argument would be good.
> The advantage over a configure option is that it doesn't require a
> recompile to use.

If we're coping with a kernel panic, can we count on a kernel
parameter still being in tact?

This is where I prove that I don't know much about systems
programming.  Feel free to ignore me. =)

Tks,
Jeff Bailey


_______________________________________________
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd