Dnia sobota, 21 sierpnia 2021 15:55:45 CEST Jim Meyering pisze: > I.e., we have to weigh "what could go wrong?" against "what would be > improved?" In this case, the weights are small on each side. That alone > argues against making a semantics-changing modification to such a tool.
The bad weight on the "for" side is 0, the counterexamples are unconvincing. BR, Chris
