On 13 Mar 2017 16:43, Paul Eggert wrote: > Thanks, I installed the attached patch to attempt to work around the > problems you reported. > > Could you please explain how ignoring the 'less -V' failure causes zless > to work on BusyBox? BusyBox 'less' ignores the LESSOPEN environment > variable, so if zless uses Busybox 'less' then zless should not work > even if the attached fix is applied.
i think it'd make more sense to update busybox's less to support -V -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
