Hello, Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> skribis:
>> I have tested your patch and can confirm it works. I still prefer my >> approach. The resulting code is simpler, and since nothing in libexec >> should be executed directly anyway, wrapping it should not be needed in >> the first place (even your version just skips the wrapping in favor of >> making a symlink; "proper" way would be to replace the symlink with an >> actual directory with wrapped content). > > I think it's safer to wrap binaries under libexec; these are sometimes > used in D-Bus services for example, and wrapping is useful on them. I agree; in the general case, we want to wrap them. I submitted the patch discussed above: https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/10609 Ludo’.
