Hi Guillaume, On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 10:19, Guillaume Le Vaillant <g...@posteo.net> wrote:
> So far Slime still uses the function getting the source file timestamp, > so these timestamps can't be removed from SBCL. > A patch for Slime would be accepted (see [2]), but as far as I know > nobody has worked on it yet. > > [2] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583 This is now closed. Well, using Guix b17268b, I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ diff -r --no-dereference /gnu/store/nfklpxiwjp36rpsfgr4jkr62cwb64ylw-sbcl-2.5.2-doc{,-check} Binary files /gnu/store/nfklpxiwjp36rpsfgr4jkr62cwb64ylw-sbcl-2.5.2-doc/share/doc/sbcl/sbcl.pdf and /gnu/store/nfklpxiwjp36rpsfgr4jkr62cwb64ylw-sbcl-2.5.2-doc-check/share/doc/sbcl/sbcl.pdf differ --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So the package ’sbcl’ is not fully reproducible yet. However, the initial report seems fixed. Therefore, I propose to close. And we can open another issue if or when we will be annoyed by the unreproducible PDF. WDYT? Cheers, simon
