Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > Hi, > > Rutherther <ruthert...@ditigal.xyz> skribis: > >>> ./target/guix/bin/guix home container -L ./home/modules >>> ./home/home-configuration.scm >> guix home: warning: failed to load '(ruther home channels-emacs)': >> no code for module (ruther home channels-emacs) >> ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm:1:0: warning: module name (channels) does not >> match file name 'ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' >> hint: File `./home/modules/ruther/home/channels-emacs.scm' should probably >> start with: >> >> (define-module (ruther home channels-emacs)) >> >> guix home: warning: ambiguous package specification `font-ubuntu' >> guix home: warning: choosing font-ubuntu@0.83 from ruther/home/fonts.scm:8:2 >> guix home: error: unshare: 268566528: Invalid argument > > What’s weird is that this seems to happen even before activation. > > I cannot audit the whole thing but apparently something in the config > tries to connect to the outside: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > <x home container -L home/modules home/home-configuration.scm > > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at > 'https://codeberg.org/guix/guix-mirror'... > guix home: error: failed to load 'home/home-configuration.scm': > web/client.scm:338:10: In procedure open-socket-for-uri: > In procedure getaddrinfo: Servname not supported for ai_socktype > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
So this is after the build? I have added inferiors recently for using Emacs 30, that would explain it before build, but after build I am clueless why that would happen. Though if it's before build, I am surprised you got an error like that, unless you were purposefully in environment without network. I added the inferiors just yesterday, commit 819ee341ab6bcc9846b099572af185c781b82a1d shouldn't be downloading anything. > > Probably use of ‘current-guix’? > > Anyway, do you think you could boil it down to a minimal reproducer? I will definitely try to, but probably not today, in a few days, hopefully by the end of the week. > > Thanks, > Ludo’.
