On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 7:52 AM Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 10:52, glaz--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix 
> <bug-guix@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > I did some minor research on my patch. Looks like I was wrong. There are
> > more than one package, that is not available via DLCDN, but only on
> > archive.apache.org. So the best solutions seems to be to change the list
> > of mirrors in download.scm as described earlier.
> >
> > -      (apache             ; from
> > http://www.apache.org/mirrors/dist.html
> > -       "http://www.eu.apache.org/dist/";
> > -       "http://www.us.apache.org/dist/";
> > -       "https://ftp.nluug.nl/internet/apache/";
> > -       "http://apache.mirror.iweb.ca/";
> > -       "http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/apache/";
> > -       "http://apache.mirrors.ovh.net/ftp.apache.org/dist/";
> > -       "http://apache-mirror.rbc.ru/pub/apache/";
> > -       "ftp://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/apache/";
> > -       "http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/apache/";
> > -
> > +      (apache ; see https://apache.org/history/mirror-history.html
> > +       "https://dlcdn.apache.org/";
>
> I think it is best to tweak the list of mirrors as you suggest here.
> However, why remove all the others?  Are they officially down?
>
> What I would suggest is the list:
>
>       (apache ; see https://apache.org/history/mirror-history.html
>        "https://dlcdn.apache.org/";
>        "http://www.eu.apache.org/dist/";
>        "http://www.us.apache.org/dist/";
>        "https://ftp.nluug.nl/internet/apache/";
>        "http://apache.mirror.iweb.ca/";
>        "http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/apache/";
>        "http://apache.mirrors.ovh.net/ftp.apache.org/dist/";
>        "http://apache-mirror.rbc.ru/pub/apache/";
>        "ftp://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/apache/";
>        "http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/apache/";
>
> Hence the first item will be tried first.  And if it fails, the other
> will be checked.  Then if it still fails, Guix will try other sources as
> Webarchive, Software Heritage, etc.
>
> Cheers,
> simon

Is the update in 766822aa87b94eacb3c49fd68261ae4ce9088a56 sufficient
to mark this as done?



Reply via email to