Hi, Luis Felipe <sirga...@zoho.com> skribis:
> Yes, it seems bayfront is now using the version of Artanis that > introduced a "plugins" system and it is expecting the Guix Packages > Website to have a "conf/plugins.scm" module, which it hasn't because > current version was tested for Artanis 0.6 and 1.0. Should I start > specifying the versions of the dependencies to avoid these kinds of > problems? I think this is not the first time this happens. Yes, maybe we need to pin the version of Artanis that is used for guix-packages-website, unless Artanis 1.0 makes promises about API stability? Ludo’.