Hi Divya, Divya Ranjan <di...@subvertising.org> writes:
> Hello again Giovanni, > > I’ll just go ahead and CC some old developers from Guix who were > initially part of bringing Jami to Guix. Found them by searching down > the mailing list[0]. > > Hopefully y’all can guide us a bit with regards to where things are going > wrong. I'm guessing it's simply getting a bit dated? In my experience, as soon as you fall one on a few stable releases behind, you start experimenting more problems. I'm not sure if Jami is supposed to be backward compatible with previous versions, but even if it was, it's probably not super well tested. I'd suggest updating it (but as you noted, that's sadly often not trivial). I could provide some assistance if you'd like to pick up its maintenance. -- Thanks, Maxim
