Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.cour...@inria.fr> skribis: > I stumbled upon this interesting non-deterministic failure while > building ‘gcc-mesboot-4.9.4.drv’ on current ‘core-packages-team’ (which > is unchanged compared to ‘master’):
Just got another one: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- checking for struct sigaction.sa_sigaction... yes checking for volatile sig_atomic_t... yes checking for sighandler_t... yes checking for sigprocmask... (cached) yes checking whether sleep is declared... yes checking for working sleep... yes checking for socklen_t... Backtrace: In gash/shell.scm: 129: 19 [sh:exec-let () "ac_fn_c_try_compile" "2817"] In gash/environment.scm: 215: 18 [save-variables-excursion () ...] 292: 17 [with-arguments # #<procedure 2210f00 at gash/shell.scm:145:25 ()>] 389: 16 [call-with-return #<procedure 2210e40 at gash/shell.scm:147:28 ()>] In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 619: 15 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> ((<sh-begin> # # # ...))] 619: 14 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# # # # ...)] In gash/shell.scm: 441: 13 [sh:cond # #] 55: 12 [without-errexit #<procedure 13185e0 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>] 372: 11 [sh:and #<procedure 1318560 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...] 55: 10 [without-errexit #<procedure 1318560 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>] 372: 9 [sh:and #<procedure 1318500 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()> ...] 55: 8 [without-errexit #<procedure 1318500 at gash/eval.scm:149:6 ()>] In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 616: 7 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# # # # ...)] 619: 6 [for-each #<procedure eval-sh (exp)> (# # #)] In gash/shell.scm: 245: 5 [#<procedure 1f63030 at gash/shell.scm:239:17 ()>] 129: 4 [sh:exec-let () "grep" "-v" "^ *+" "conftest.err"] 92: 3 [exec-utility () ...] In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 616: 2 [for-each #<procedure ea9a60 at gash/shell.scm:70:12 (i)> (0 1 2 ...)] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1473: 1 [dup->port #<input: file 20> "r" 7] In unknown file: ?: 0 [fdopen 7 "r"] ERROR: In procedure fdopen: ERROR: In procedure scm_fdes_to_port: Bad file descriptor yes checking whether symlink handles trailing slash correctly... yes checking whether <sys/ioctl.h> declares ioctl... yes checking for unsetenv... yes checking for unsetenv() return type... int --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- That one likely doesn’t change the build outcome since it still determines that ‘socklen_t’ is defined, but it sounds a bit like a dice roll. Ludo’.
