Christopher Howard <christop...@librehacker.com> writes: > So, my experiment was to see if I could run the scheme command «(guix-command > "pull")» from the console instead, just using guix repl. However, since guix > repl will not load any emacs-guix scheme code, I had to add > "/home/christopher/Repos/emacs-guix/scheme" to the GUILE_LOAD_PATH in order to > be able to load (emacs-guix) module. > > Hopefully that clarifies what I am seeing.
I see. Thank you for clarifying. > Looking at this now, I see that there are significant differences between the > paths for paths in %load-path vs paths in GUILE_LOAD_PATH. Yes. The "guix-module-union" entry I alluded to was one of the differences I had observed between %load-path values between "guile" and "guix repl" when both were invoked from the commandline (outside of Emacs). It may help for a future version of emacs-guix to take some steps to resolve said differences, if you find them to be material / problematic. -- Suhail
