Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis: > Hi, > > Guillaume Le Vaillant <g...@posteo.net> writes: > >> Lars-Dominik Braun <l...@6xq.net> skribis: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> it seems the core-updates branch is first in the merge-queue. haskell-team >>> was successfully built by the CI and is ready to be merged. Since there >>> does not seem to be an ETA for core-updates, can I skip the queue and >>> go ahead with merging haskell-team? >>> >>> Lars >> >> Hi. >> The lisp-team branch is also in a good shape and ready to be merged. > > I think it's fine to merge these first; perhaps the core-updates merge > request should be removed if it was preposterous (usually we issue the > merge request when we are confident the branch is ready to me merged).
Hi. It might be more logical to have two steps. First a "work started on xyz-team branch" message to indicate to the QA to make the stats for this branch, and then the "request for merging xyz-team branch" message to put the branch in the merge queue. I'll try to merge the lisp-team branch tomorrow (UTC+2 timezone).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
