Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, > > Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> writes: > >> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I was looking at top on the hydra-guix-129 node, which runs nar-herder, >>> and saw this: >>> >>> 4772 nar-her+ 20 0 28.9g 11.5g 100.0 6.1 55,55 S .nar-herder-rea >>> >>> 11.5 GiB of memory seems a bit excessive, no? Its cumulated processing >>> time is also at the top of the table, and it seems stuck at 100% of CPU >>> usage. >>> >>> Is this expected of the nar-herder, or has it gone awry? >> >> I think hydra-guix-129 was running an older version of the nar-herder, >> so I've updated it and I think that's improved the situation. >> >> I've just reconfigured the machine to use a specific commit at the >> moment, but it would be good to bump the commit that the Guix package is >> using. > > The situation appears unresolved; c.f. `top' output on hydra-guix-129: > > 62775 nar-her+ 20 0 903.7g 93.9g 0.0 49.8 22,44 S `- fibers 0 This has since been resolved; it currently uses 675.6 MiB on hydra-guix-129. Thanks, Christopher! -- Thanks, Maxim
