Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hi!
> Janneke Nieuwenhuizen writes: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: > If there are no objections I'll go forward and install this patch by the > end of the weekend. So, I've been running guix pull from hurd-team on the Hurd all day. Starting with the max-25 files split without (gc), it failed 5 consecutive times building guix-packages-base. Because the initial patch worked pretty well and had the (gc) call (and yes, also used the 26-way split), I re-added (gc), and now the fourth attempt succeeded. After `guix-packages-base' built, `guix-packages' then built right away. I seem to remember guix-packages was the main problem when I wrote the first version of this patch some four months ago, but that one split the list of packages 26-way of course. That suggests that the (combined) compilation of certain files is especially problematic, or that it has since become more problematic (<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66063>). On the other hand, we may be able to use more than 4GiB of memory on the Hurd some time soon (and after we upgrade and compile using --enable-pae) <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2023-08/msg00090.html>. Pushed to master as 658de25e990a56265e2398a3737e9cf1eb57af68 Greetings, Janneke -- Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com
