>jeu. 14 sept. 2023 at 13:33, Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> wrote:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 10:53:44PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Friendly ping. :-) >> >> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63986 >> >> Ludo’. >> >> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> skribis: >> >> > Hi there! >> > >> > What’s the status? Sounds like we have a couple of fixes already. >> > >> > Maybe you can submit one of them to guix-patc...@gnu.org so qa.guix can >> > pick it up. And if one of them is more intrusive (more rebuilds), then >> > submit it separately so it gets merged later? How does that sound? >> > >> > Ludo’. > > I've attached a diff to adjust openblas64 and to use it for x86_64 in > julia. I don't know if it's faster than the current openblas. I have applied the patch in a freshly cloned guix repo, and build julia within a shell as for the instructions under ’Contributing’. I get the 13 ms when running the original test, so I guess the issue is solved (other than thinking about the feasibility of performance tests to avoid this kind of situations). Thanks a lot ! C.
