Hi Ludo, > I had forgotten about this issue (my apologies…) and stumbled upon it > again recently, which led me to approach it a bit differently: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65229 > > Let me know what you think!
This looks good to me. In practice, I doubt anyone would use -q with time-machine, because it makes more sense to specify an explicit channel file every time. But for pull, I can well imaging using it in a reproducibility-oriented setting. Cheers, Konrad
