Robby Zambito <cont...@robbyzambito.me> writes: > Strangely with-extensions doesn't seem to be including the whole > dependency tree for me. Should it?
No, I don't think it should. It *would* be possible to traverse the package inputs and add all the GUILE-BUILD-SYSTEM-using packages, but then you get the problem that not all Guile packages have their dependencies specified in the INPUTS list (for some reason, IIRC, you need the Guile dependencies to be in both INPUTS *and* NATIVE-INPUTS, but some have them only in NATIVE-INPUTS). The problem there is that if you have a dependency that's only in NATIVE-INPUTS, it's difficult to tell if it's actually used by the application or by, say, a build script. -- (
