Jelle Licht <jli...@fsfe.org> writes:
Thanks for the workaround! Is this "thou shall delete N times,
and
_exactly_ N times" effect of the recently pushed change
functioning as
intended? It imho seems pretty brittle and verbose compared to
how
things were before.
We could add a ‘delete-all’ in addition to the existing ‘delete’
behavior. Alternately, we could change ‘delete’ back to deleting
everything and adding ‘delete-one’. Or have both ‘delete-all’ and
‘delete-one’ where ‘delete’ is a deprecated alias for ‘delete-all’
to add a path forward for older configs.
Of the three I'm most partial to the last, though I love none of
them. I keep thinking the right solution is to have a delete that
can match with a predicate, but then why not just use ‘filter’ or
‘remove’?
-bjc
