Simon Tournier <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, > > On Wed, 03 May 2023 at 21:33, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > >>> Why does Guix require ’graphviz’ in the first place? >> >> It uses it to build images in the manual. > > Ah. So we are dragging X11 libraries as libx11 for one or two figures > in the manual. :-) > > Although that’s not exactly the same as “guix pull”, > > guix graph guix -t bag-emerged > > gives an idea. Well, for example, there is a path from guix to ninja > via graphviz. > > While I understand that the documentation is important, could we skip it > for some architectures? Or just move it to a separate output or package? That should really be something done for all packages automatically tbh. Alpine gets this right.