Hi Josselin, Josselin Poiret <d...@jpoiret.xyz> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.cour...@inria.fr> writes: > >> The reason for this bug seems to be given here: >> >> https://github.com/nestybox/sysbox/issues/67#issuecomment-726285026 >> >> It’s not clear whether there’s anything we can do, other than >> recommending ‘-CN’ as well in the nested container. > > Couldn't we always create a new network namespace, but when -N is passed > it also has a veth interface? The one problem I can think of is that > we'd need to either create one veth per interface in the parent > namespace or let the user specify which interface should be shared. Maybe we could, but I must confess I’m totally clueless on this veth thing. :-) What would this entail? Hopefully guile-netlink can help? Thanks, Ludo’.
