Hi, Attila Lendvai <att...@lendvai.name> writes:
> (define-public fontconfig > [...] > (name "fontconfig-minimal") > > this tripped me up. is this a mistake? > > if not, then please add a comment that explains this anomaly. There's already a comment above fontconfig-with-documentation that reads: This is intentionally named 'fontconfig', as it's intended as the user-facing fontconfig package The original fontconfig was renamed fontconfig-minimal but the variable was not renamed to avoid having to adjust the rest of the code base. It could be done, and then the fontconfig-with-documentation *variable* could be renamed to simply fontconfig. That'd be more conventional. Would you like to give it a try? It shouldn't cause any rebuild, I think. -- Thanks, Maxim
