Hi, On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 17:37, zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This case should be covered by Disarchive and SWH. Well, is it worth to > keep open this issue when the question about the time-machine coverage > is bigger than just this example. After 2 weeks without an answer, I am closing since this specific case is already covered by the ongoing work around Disarchive and SWH. Feel free to reopen if I miss something. Cheers, simon
