zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:09, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: >> >>> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337. >> >> Yay! Thank you! And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build >> farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'? >> >> That is odd. > > Because blast+ is multi-outputs and ’out’ is fine contrary to ’include’: > > $ guix challenge blast+:include > /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include contents > differ: > local hash: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: > 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x > > https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: > 0cakizfsqb1lla62cmwnng1h9gvqgf3lyjk0k7lkiaisj713mpzx > differing files: > /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h > /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h > > 1 store items were analyzed: > - 0 (0.0%) were identical > - 1 (100.0%) differed > - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive Ah, thanks for explaining! -- Ricardo
