Hello Maxim, Thanks for looking at this. Here's a v2.
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm curious, what does delaying the field buys us here? Is it to avoid > printing the warning multiple times when the record is evaluated? Right, and this would get worse if someone ended up inheriting from another configuration. It would be bad UX IMO. > By convention, a warning message should not be a complete sentence (no > capitalized first letter nor last period) and be short. To provide a > human friendly hint/message, you could use 'display-hint' (combined with > a more succinct warning). Right, fixed! > The rest LGTM. > > Maxim Josselin Poiret (2): system: Align zram priority with swap-space spec to clarify. doc: Remove double copyright. doc/guix.texi | 11 +++++------ gnu/services/linux.scm | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.36.0