Ludovic Courtès schreef op do 12-05-2022 om 10:18 [+0200]: > To me, the conclusion is that the package has a invalid URI, so it’s not > a Guix bug strictly speaking. However, we could change > gnu-maintenance.scm so that it deals with invalid URIs gracefully. > > Thoughts?
Maybe emit a warning and skip them? Or just skip them (by returning #false in the is-it-a-gnu-package procedure)? Extending Guile to support IRIs can be left for later I think. Greetings, Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
