Hi Bengt, > I think IWBN if a busy volunteer like yourself could add > a cookie in an email like yours that would automatically > provide a "heads-up" to readers of the documentation you > intend to patch. > > The idea is that emails could be automatically scanned for > such cookies/markup, e.g. maybe "[Pending-Patch]", next to > an URL for the doc in question, which URL could then simply > be appended to a log file of such urls, (maybe together with > date and author from the email header).
I think this is a great idea. Does something like this already exist? If it does, I'm unaware of it (and I am sorry I didn't use it here). If I've otherwise misstepped some kind of convention here, please let me know. I'm not great at picking up subtext, but it sounds like I messed up in some way, and I'd like to learn so I don't do it again (still very new to contributing to this community). That said, I do indeed intend to patch [Pending-Patch] https://guix.gnu.org/cuirass/manual/cuirass.html#Specifications to be clearer about the available targets. I would amend the subject of this issue, but it doesn't seem like that's something I can do. -- Christopher Rodriguez
