Christopher Rodriguez schreef op wo 23-03-2022 om 10:42 [-0400]: > > "git" is not a version numberr, I suggest "0" instead. > > Also, why is a ‘random’ git commit used instead of an upstream > > version? > > The upstream package at https://git.sr.ht/~rabbits/orca does not have > any tags, let alone version tags. And as near as I can tell, it does > not use semantic versioning at all. I used "git" because of my > experience with rpm packaging; I have changed this to 0 here, to > align with Guix conventions.
Ok, together with the comment you added.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part