On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 09:34:11PM -0600, bdju wrote: > It would be difficult to test now, I no longer have an empty SSD waiting > to be installed on in the same PC.
Understood. > I ended up getting through an install > with the last stable release using the same settings. > From memory, it was set up for EFI, btrfs root partition, encryption > enabled, boot partition was fat32, I chose no environment (wanted to use > sway), accepted networkmanager, tor, cups... I kept the default > generated config.scm because it often crashed when trying to edit and I > was sick of starting over. I think the crash was either right before the > screen where you can edit the config or right after you tell it to apply > the config. Okay. The crash when you do edit the config has been fixed, based on our testing: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53544 I know this report was about a different issue, but not as clearly defined. > I had a second HDD (not touched by the installer) in > addition to the SSD being installed on, and /dev/sdc/ was the flash > drive with the installer image on it. > I am glad to hear it's (maybe) fixed. I'll download a new ISO, but I > don't have a hypervisor configured to test this sort of thing. I could > maybe try it with a different computer, but still it would be hard to > find one I'm willing to wipe I think. Sorry I can't be more help. > I have still only ever done 3 full Guix System installs, all years > apart. Unfortunately I never considered the experience fun enough to do > besides when absolutely necessary. No worries! You already helped a lot by reporting the bug and giving us all the details you can. I will do some tests in a VM, choosing non-default filesystems and partitioning.