Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote: > > elaexuo...@wilsonb.com writes: > > > Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote: > >> This is a problem with the modular TeX Live packages. The pk files are > >> bitmap fonts. I found that adding texlive-cm-super to the union helps > >> in that the bitmap variants of the CM fonts will not be generated any > >> more. More font packages may be needed in the union to prevent TeX from > >> falling back to bitmap fonts in other cases. > >> > >> In any case, that’s unrelated to Jelle’s patch, which looks fine to me. > > > > Thank you, Ricardo, for looking into this. > > > > I have lost signficant amounts of hair trying to find a solution. Adding > > texlive-cm-super doesn't help for the document I trying to typeset. In > > fact, I > > even grabbed all texlive packages with fonts and threw them in the > > texlive-union to no effect. No matter what, pdflatex bails when trying to > > find > > the font to set $~$. > > > > The only way I have gotten it to typeset under a texlive-union so far is by > > munging texlive-amsfonts as Jelle mentioned. > > I have since added texlive-amsfonts/fixed, which installs all the files > it is supposed to (according do the tlpdb). I’ve also since fixed font > search. > > Can this issue be closed?
Are we sure this is fixed? The issue where you added texlive-amsfonts/fixed is still seeing the original missing fonts error for eufm10: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53339#3-lineno36
