On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 08:03:32PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > I got pretty far commenting out binutils-gold and adding back in gcc:lib > and the substitute snippets. Then I started failing tests requiring the > linker, so it looks like I'll actually have to troubleshoot > binutils-gold. > > I thought about trying gccgo in place of go-1.4 for the bootstrap, but > I'm pretty sure I'd still need binutils-gold.
Maybe, in the meantime, we could update go-build-system to use go-1.16, which does at least build on aarch64. This Go release is still supported, at least for a little while longer. It would be nice to not be using Go 1.14 by default in the upcoming release. What do people think about that idea?
