Hello, zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 09:53, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> I don’t think it’s a reasonable response: it’s a fact that we naturally >> tend to read manuals sparsely, at best. >> >> Since the pastes vanished, how did ‘sudo guix pull’ lead to incompatible >> bytecode warnings? > > If I remember correctly (which is neither a reasonable response :-)), it > should highly come from the user config. And the investigation needs > more information, e.g., as Tobias asks: the output of: > > $ type guix > $ ls -l ~/.config/guix/current > $ sudo rm ~/.config/guix/current > $ /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix pull > $ hash guix > $ type guix Yes, and we haven't gotten any of that information in a year. Дмитрий, I'll close this old report which I don't see actionable, but if you get hit by the problem again, it'd be helpful if you could capture the above detail and what led you to the problem. Thanks! Maxim
