Hi Jacob, Jacob Hrbek <krey...@rixotstudio.cz> writes:
>> I was curious because you said in your experience the clients other than >> Element worked well (which is not my experience). -- Maxim > > To clarify I meant that I didn't experience any issues sending or receiving > messages on those clients and I asked "Is there any reason why should I check > them?" in case you are aware of an issue that I should check. > >> When I used tried using it a couple years back it was consuming easily 1 GiB >> of memory in the browser, sometimes 2. -- Maxim > > The initial sync takes around this on my system as well which seems to grow > depending on the complexity of the account e.g. account that joined X amount > of channels and sent X amount of messages will need more resources for the > login > procedure due to the zero knowledge federation. I see. For my usage, that's too much, as I'm not comfortable dedicating up to a quarter of my system memory for a real time text messaging application. > Could you try the client again for fresh data ideally outside of the > matrix.org homeserver? I always have issues on the upstream homeserver so it > makes me feel like its not representative of the network. > > --- > > FWIW there is a script for weechat that integrates matrix as well. Yes, I'm aware of it; as I wrote earlier, I had tried it and found it too buggy to be usable, unfortunately. Could you clarify what benefits would "adopting" the Matrix channel and space provide? Isn't there already a bridge to libera.chat (thus #guix) in Matrix? Thanks, Maxim
