Hello Sarah, Em sexta-feira, 10 de setembro de 2021, às 19:14:06 -03, iskar...@mgsn.dev escreveu: > Hi Thiago, > > (Re-sent due to missing Cc.) > > September 10, 2021 3:06 PM, "Thiago Jung Bauermann" <bauerm...@kolabnow.com> wrote: > > Hello Sarah, > > > > Em quinta-feira, 2 de setembro de 2021, às 15:47:08 -03, Sarah > > Morgensen > > > > escreveu: > >> I think this might be related to [0], although if it's true that CI > >> uses > >> native builders for aarch64 now, I have no idea. > > > > The CI has two native aarch64 builders (which also do armhf, despite > > bugs 43513 and 43591): dover and overdrive1. > > > > It also uses half of the x86_64 builders (hydra-guix-*) for emulated > > builds of aarch64 and armhf, as can be seen here: > > > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/tree/hydra/berli > > n-nodes.scm#n143 > Thanks for the explanation. Is there a way to tell CI (or Guix itself) > that certain packages shouldn't be built under emulation?
I don’t know. That would certainly be useful, though. To be honest, my experience in the past couple of months with emulated builds for powerpc64le-linux wasn’t good, so I asked for it to be turned off. -- Thanks, Thiago
