bug#50349: [PATCH] packages: Add 'define-package' syntax.

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix]

Taylan Kammer 写道：

To me the most obvious thing to do seems

  (define-package foo ...)  ;no explicit name needed


package, with the possibility to override the name like

  (define-package foo (name "foobar") ...)

which would bind the variable 'foo' to a package named "foobar".

to bind the variable 'foo' and use symbol->string for the name of the

Kind regards,

T G-R

Right, that's what I meant, and it's how I read bug #15284, and it looks remarkably like the form I use in my personal channels (and I'm sure I'm not the first! :-). You're much better at the language/implementation side of things than I am, Taylan. Would this negatively affect performance (including ‘guix pull’ compilation)?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature