Hi, On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 18:38, "Philip Munksgaard" <phi...@munksgaard.me> wrote: > As far as I can tell, this is actually an instance of > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/48701. You can close this issue in favor of that > one.
>From my understanding, no. I propose to unmerge. WDYT? The bug#48700 is a duplicate of bug#44115 (recursive importers). For instance, a first attempt to fix it is proposed by patch#45984; a new version should come soon. :-) But bug#48701 is not related, instead it is related to the Cabal implemented by Guix. For instance, this works: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- for p in bytestring-to-vector bmp directory-tree language-c-quote mainland-pretty neat-interpolation pcg-random srcloc; \ do guix import hackage $p -r ; done guix import hackage futhark --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- i.e., the option recursive with ’futhark’ goes to ’recursive-import’ from (guix import utils) and the ’node’ is not always well-formed when ’lookup-node’ as explained in #44115 and #45984. <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/44115> <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/45984> All the best, simon
