Hi Ludo, > Is it reproducible? (You can run “make check TESTS=tests/publish.scm”.)
Yes. > If it is, could you add ‘pk’ calls here and there to see which of the > sub-expressions in (and …) returns false? 'pk' shows nothing, but I rolled my own version using plain old "display" and found that (stat:perms (lstat nar)) is #o664 rather than the expected #o644. Cheers, Konrad.
