Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> skribis:
> I've just ran two builds; the current qemu we have, and the one with > the static output added: > > /gnu/store/aqkr351pph30za9v6bmd8gzpq5gbgz0c-qemu-5.1.0-doc > /gnu/store/apxxj92gncx901z71kq0gwg48n2cils6-qemu-5.1.0 > > real 6m56.816s > user 0m13.733s > sys 0m0.677s > > /gnu/store/4bfj6zxl0yd2i3206v4rkwiv2nwyryxb-qemu-5.1.0-doc > /gnu/store/7w04gv6m92n40dainn4s6xr3l20r90xw-qemu-5.1.0 > /gnu/store/wqh2dyskzkl4vjn6harclyl317h4vfaf-qemu-5.1.0-static > > real 7m39.197s > user 0m15.035s > sys 0m0.841s > > That's about a 10% increase in build time, which is reasonable IMO. Yes, sounds good. > In the future we should definitely split our QEMU package into > per-architecture variants as well as user vs system emulation, similar > to what Debian does. A near 755.8 MiB package is cumbersome and I'm > doubtful most of its users make use of the 35 architectures it boasts at > a time :-). Agreed! Thanks, Ludo’.
