Hi Mark, On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 17:12, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> wrote:
> Well, as I vaguely recall (possibly mistakenly), ghc-memory sometimes > built successfully back in 2015 on i686-linux as well. The issue I > reported was that it often failed. This could happen. I remember similar hard time with the package Guitarix and bug#21803. > Unfortunately, last I checked, Cuirass still does not provide anything > close to the level of functionality that Hydra previously provided for > us. So maybe this bug still exists, or maybe it doesn't. The > information provided by 'guix weather' is too crude to answer that > question. I agree. Running on all the public build farms I am aware of, I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix weather ghc-memory -s i686-linux --substitute-urls="https://ci.guix.gnu.org https://bayfront.guix.gnu.org https://guix.cbaines.net https://guix.tobias.gr https://builds.guix-patches.cbaines.net"; computing 1 package derivations for i686-linux... [...] https://ci.guix.gnu.org 100.0% substitutes available (2 out of 2) [...] https://bayfront.guix.gnu.org 0.0% substitutes available (0 out of 2) [...] https://guix.cbaines.net 100.0% substitutes available (2 out of 2) [...] https://guix.tobias.gr 0.0% substitutes available (0 out of 2) [...] https://builds.guix-patches.cbaines.net 0.0% substitutes available (0 out of 2) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- However, I am not convinced that bayfront.guix.gnu.org, guix.tobias.gr and builds.guix-patches.cbaines.net build for i686 since they do not even have the package ’hello’. Well, a second data point is still crude. > Thanks again for working through these old bugs, Simon. It is a pleasure, or at least a fun mean to be more familiar with Guix. :-) All the best, simon
