Hi Taylan, Apologies for the delay, it seems I hadn’t noticed your reply.
Taylan Kammer <taylan.kam...@gmail.com> skribis: > Yes, you're right. I've made another release (1.0.9), where I use > > (environment '(guile) '(bytestructures guile numeric-data-model)) > > for the 'base-environment' binding in case we're running on Guile. > > It now gives me correct results locally (woe on me for not having > properly tested the previous one) so I think it should definitely work > when cross-compiling too, since the 'eval' is sure to be executed at > run-time and not compile-time... 1.0.9 seems to help my rather involved use case (Guix cross-compiled to GNU/Hurd from x86_64-linux, then running ‘guix pull’, which depends on Guile-Git, which uses Bytestructures) but it still eventually crashes: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ludo@childhurd ~$ /gnu/store/mxi1za8gdq77438ywgzdzy2zywb9nk76-guix-1.2.0rc1-1.3ba6ffd/bin/guix pull Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... receiving objects 25% [############# ]Illegal instruction --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The problem may well be elsewhere though. However, at the REPL I can no longer access the ‘numeric’ module: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ludo@childhurd ~$ /gnu/store/mxi1za8gdq77438ywgzdzy2zywb9nk76-guix-1.2.0rc1-1.3ba6ffd/bin/guix repl GNU Guile 3.0.4 Copyright (C) 1995-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'. This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. Enter `,help' for help. scheme@(guix-user)> ,m(bytestructures body numeric) While executing meta-command: error: environment: unbound variable scheme@(guix-user)> (@@ (bytestructures body numeric) arch-32bit?) While compiling expression: error: environment: unbound variable --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Thoughts? Thanks, Ludo’.
