Dear, On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 at 09:57, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> As of 04fa4cdf95a004bda4d63b6578b53e154a4d4679: Comparing with 58af4c9621af02cc4e2bb5692d4b377084b0fcc6. > $ guix size postgresql > store item total self > /gnu/store/4xxd00drj8gjcr84xdfna44qak2vhwmf-binutils-2.27 87.6 > 49.3 24.6% > /gnu/store/iwgi9001dmmihrjg4rqhd6pa6788prjw-glibc-2.24 38.3 > 36.8 18.4% > /gnu/store/cdi08kw7r6r684w8mk0xq0dkgpjhfpmd-gcc-4.9.4-lib 61.0 > 22.7 11.3% > /gnu/store/awmx27f02la7sc4s63jxsdczclsf63gj-postgresql-9.5.5 200.5 > 20.0 10.0% > /gnu/store/9xfn6q7cxqxaxsv6kgiic9iygl2iv2ci-coreutils-8.25 78.8 > 14.4 7.2% > /gnu/store/6slzn4ixcjlhy3av3biglqfli9pwxcn9-guile-2.0.12 103.4 > 12.7 6.3% [...] > /gnu/store/c7lm5innppxm53bf5w7i99d59kjdyx27-ld-wrapper-0 152.8 > 0.0 0.0% > total: 200.5 MiB --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix size postgresql store item total self /gnu/store/m1z7cdbqsqyp9xnjw5cvlb4a7gkcg3m4-binutils-2.34 93.0 54.6 21.4% /gnu/store/0m0vd873jp61lcm4xa3ljdgx381qa782-guile-3.0.2 132.8 53.2 20.9% /gnu/store/fa6wj5bxkj5ll1d7292a70knmyl7a0cr-glibc-2.31 38.4 36.7 14.4% /gnu/store/01b4w3m6mp55y531kyi1g8shh722kwqm-gcc-7.5.0-lib 71.0 32.6 12.8% /gnu/store/2w144h8kp0pzngi5zziay3pz0hxqii6i-postgresql-11.6 254.6 24.2 9.5% /gnu/store/57xj5gcy1jbl9ai2lnrqnpr0dald9i65-coreutils-8.32 88.0 17.0 6.7% /gnu/store/a45p39mgqvfd8kjwibyr0q42k1mw7gmf-util-linux-2.35.1-lib 80.0 9.0 3.5% /gnu/store/dkzivzn17qilmqdfpyps62b395wxhshh-openssl-1.1.1f 77.4 6.4 2.5% [...] /gnu/store/mpa04aq8lblbcviyxywxcsb1zbi0mf39-ld-wrapper-0 187.5 0.1 0.0% total: 254.6 MiB --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > We should at least remove the dependency on ld-wrapper, which is > probably not justified. The command “guix graph postgresql -t bag | dot -Tpdf > /tmp/psql.pdf” shows that this ’ld-wrapper-0“ comes from ‘util-linux’. Therefore, is it affordable to remove this dependency? All the best, simon
