Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <m...@tobias.gr> writes: > Would it make sense to provide a faster-building slower-starting Knot > variant alongside the main package?
I'm inclined to say "no", especially if we assume a substitute will (nearly always) be available. Unless someone is hacking on the scanner directly it ought to be safe to add "--disable-fastparser" to dns.scm temporarily during testing, then remove it before submitting a patch. If it isn't then probably _that_ is the bug to be fixed. > What I didn't know was that these generated C files were included in > the release tarball. We have the Ragel, we can rebuild them, and we > now do so in commit 2b73e50c31a61b5dcef35a1e4b9484d9dbcb0fbc. Neat! -- Simon South si...@simonsouth.net
