Hello Mark!

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 01:53:36PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Agreed.  When I wrote of implementing an "automatic refresh", I meant
> something very different and much more limited than what "Refresh
> IceCat" in <about:support> does: I meant merely to refresh the embedded
> store names in the user profile to be valid again, without modifying any
> user customizations.
> 
> Additionally, if a bundled extension was not explicitly disabled by the
> user, but became nonfunctional due to this bug, I would like the
> yet-to-written new code to do what is needed to make it functional
> again.  Also, when IceCat is updated, any bundled extensions should be
> automatically updated as well.  However, any bundled extensions that the
> user explicitly disabled should stay disabled.
> 
> Does that make sense?

Definitely!

Andreas




Reply via email to