Hi, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> skribis:
> From fd4955cd0a61e92c37a371e4c5411a505ad5ac76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Florian Pelz <pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> > Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:54:04 +0200 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Subject: [PATCH] doc: Clarify what propagated inputs are. > > Fixes <https://issues.guix.info/issue/26170>. > > * doc/guix.texi (package Reference)[package-propagated-inputs]: Clarify. > --- > doc/guix.texi | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi > index 1d6782e6fa..0a5640b174 100644 > --- a/doc/guix.texi > +++ b/doc/guix.texi > @@ -6360,21 +6360,21 @@ this area (@pxref{Invoking guix lint}). > > @anchor{package-propagated-inputs} > Lastly, @code{propagated-inputs} is similar to @code{inputs}, but the > -specified packages will be automatically installed alongside the package > +specified packages will be automatically installed to profiles > (@pxref{Features, the role of profiles in Guix}) alongside the package Like zimoun wrote, please introduce a newline. > Another example where @code{propagated-inputs} is useful is for languages > that lack a facility to record the run-time search path akin to the > @code{RUNPATH} of ELF files; this includes Guile, Python, Perl, and > -more. To ensure that libraries written in those languages can find > -library code they depend on at run time, run-time dependencies must be > -listed in @code{propagated-inputs} rather than @code{inputs}. > +more. When packaging libraries written in those languages, ensure they can > find > +library code they depend on at run time by listing run-time dependencies > +in @code{propagated-inputs} rather than @code{inputs}. I’m not convinced about this hunk; it uses imperative tense towards the reader to state the same thing no? Otherwise LGTM, thanks! Ludo’.
